House To Call On Reyes During Roll Call

MANILA – Quezon City Rep. Sonny Belmonte on Friday said it will be Regina Ongsiako Reyes, not Lord Allan Velasco, who will be called during the roll call of members for the inaugural session of the 16th Congress on Monday.

The Supreme Court earlier upheld the Commission on Elections’ decision disqualifying Reyes from running for congresswoman of Marinduque due to issues about her citizenship. The decision benefits her rival, Lord Allan, who is the son of SC Associate Presbitero Velasco Jr.

For her part, Reyes said it is the House of Representatives electoral tribunal and not Comelec that should decide on her case.

Velasco wrote the House secretary general to show his proclamation and ask that he be allowed to assume the post of Marinduque representative after Reyes' proclamation was annulled by Comelec.

"Our own thinking at moment is proclamation of Reyes plus her subsequent taking of oath and so forth entitle her to be considered a member and that the case be decided by the HRET. It’s not only her case,” Belmonte said.

Belmonte said similar cases will be handled by the HRET.

Meanwhile, the lawmaker said he is confident he will be re-elected Speaker of the House of Representatives.

He also said many of the positions of the Lower House will be elected Monday during the inaugural session.

"I hope so. I think so. I think that the, I recall when I first went for Speaker in 2001 I found I was only 2 votes ahead of 50% plus one. Last year, I did better. Hopefully this year, I hope it will also be better with the day, the big day within 3 days of today,” he told reporters.

“We don’t have to solve everything by Monday. Within few days after Monday by the coming week we hope to be able to fill up virtually all positions in question,” he added.

Belmonte said the chairman of the House appropriations committee may be named in time for the submission of the 2014 budget proposal on Tuesday.

He hinted many of the chairmanships in the 15th Congress may have been unchanged.

Belmonte expects the headcount of the majority at 250-260.

Spend PDAF in own district

Belmonte said he prefers congressmen to spend their priority development assistance funds (PDAF) in their own district rather than give them to another district.

He said he has also talked to the Commission on Audit, which is auditing all PDAF disbursements, to check actual use and not necessarily zero in on personalities then show the results to the public.

Salamat Abs-CbnNews!

House throws out Comelec, SC ruling on electoral cases

July 17, 2013 9:04 pm

by Llanesca T. Panti Reporter

 

The House of Representatives have recognized two women lawmakers thus far even if both Commission on Elections (Comelec) and the Supreme Court nullified their election victory.
This developed after the Public Relations and Information Bureau of the House of Representatives released a partial, unofficial list of district representatives for the 16th Congress.


Dr. Angelina “Helen” Tan was identified as the representative of the fourth district of Quezon province, while Regina Reyes is named as the representative of the Lone District of Marinduque.

Tan beat Wigberto “Toby” Tañada Jr. of the ruling Liberal Party in the May polls by 4,000 votes, but the Comelec nullified Tan’s proclamation as winner by June 30. In the same Comelec decision, the poll body tasked the Provincial Board of Canvassers to transfer the 7,038 votes of a certain Alvin Tañada to Toby because Alvin is disqualified from participating in the 2013 Congressional race.

Reyes, on the other hand, won against then incumbent Rep. Lord Allan Velasco of Marinduque, son of Supreme Court Justice Presbitero Velasco. But in June 25, the Supreme Court ruled that Reyes is a US citizen and therefore is not qualified to be a representative.

The High Court decision on Reyes’ case affirmed the earlier decision of the Comelec.

Rep. Neptali Gonzales 2nd of Mandaluyong, who is assured of retaining his House Majority Leader post in the 16th Congress, earlier stressed that Tan and Reyes remain the legitimate winners in the May elections because any nature of electoral protest or qualification questions will be under the jurisdiction of the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal (HRET) once the winners are proclaimed by the Provincial Board of Canvassers.

The Comelec ruling on Tan and Supreme Court decision on Reyes’ case both came after they were proclaimed winners.

“We will apply the principle of the HRET having the exclusive jurisdiction and sole judge once a member had been proclaimed by Comelec and had taken his/her oath before any officer authorized to administer an oath to all members, including party-list representatives who have been proclaimed by the Comelec,” Gonzales stressed in an interview.

“The Comelec and Supreme Court should back off from encroaching on the exclusive jurisdiction of HRET. They can’t take away the powers of HRET to hear electoral protests against lawmakers as guaranteed by the Constitution,” Gonzales added.

The HRET, whose members will be named after the 16th Congress opens its First Regular Session on July 22, can take as much as three years to resolve electoral protest cases.

Mababasa dito

Marites Vitug: Dark Clouds in Supreme Court!

The victory of Regina Reyes over the incumbent, Lord Allan Velasco, in the recent congressional race in the lone district of Marinduque must be hard for the Velascos to accept. After all, Allan broke the decades-old, enduring rule of the Reyes family in the province in 2010.



At the time, it was said that Allan changed the landscape of Marinduque elections. He ran a well-funded and aggressive campaign. It helped that his father, Presbitero Velasco Jr, a Supreme Court justice, was a known power figure who lurked in the shadows of the campaign.

The talk then was Allan’s victory heralded the beginning of the Velascos’ newfound hold on the province. Later, to consolidate this euphoric win, as Allan prepared to run for re-election, the Velascos organized a party-list group, Ang Mata’y Alagaan or AMA, to add one more family member in Congress.

As things turned out, after serving only one term, Allan lost his plum post to the Reyeses, giving the old political family renewed control of Marinduque. (The governor is Carmencita Reyes, Regina’s mother.)

But the Velascos did not completely lose as Lorna, the mother of Allan, is going to sit in the new Congress. She is the first nominee of AMA and is supposed to work for the interests of those with impaired vision. (The 2 other nominees are the Velascos' daughter and son.)

Velasco allies, however, found supposed lapses in Regina Reyes’s candidacy and questioned her citizenship before the Comelec, citing documents uploaded in a blog.

Reyes moved fast. Immediately after the Comelec proclaimed her winner (her lead over Allan was almost 4,000 votes), she took her oath before Speaker Feliciano Belmonte Jr.

Meantime, the Comelec ruled against Reyes. She then elevated the case to the Supreme Court. This is where things get interesting. The Court, known to move in glacial ways, swiftly upheld Comelec, without question. In effect, the decision favors Allan.

What is contentious here, among other issues, is who really has jurisdiction over the case, which the Court blithely glossed over. Normally, election protests of congressional candidates fall with the HRET or the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal.

Father Joaquin Bernas pointed out one way this case could have been decided: “…the Court could say to the petitioner, ‘Go to the electoral tribunal as the sole judge of all contests.’”


Brion’s dissent

In his lucidly written dissent, Brion questioned the “outright dismissal” of the case and the “reckless” refusal of the majority to have the respondents, at the very least, comment on the petition “in light of the gravity of the issues raised, the potential effect on jurisprudence…” He found the majority’s approach “unusual.”

He argued: “The Court’s role as adjudicator and the demands of basic fairness require that we should fully hear the parties and rule based on our appreciation of the merits…”

He was incredulous that the majority accepted a blog as evidence, together with photocopies of documents. “To accept these materials as statements of truth is to be partisan and to deny the petitioner her right to…due process.” Associate Justices Antonio Carpio, Marvic Leonen, and Martin Villarama joined Brion in his dissent.

I take Brion’s dissent seriously because, in other cases, he has held a mirror to the Court, pointing out his colleagues’ violation of the Court’s internal rules.

In the infamous Dinagat case, wherein the Court flip-flopped and re-opened a case that had been entered into the book of judgments, Brion wrote: “Unlike the case of Lazarus who rose from the dead through a miracle, Dinagat resurrected because the Court disregarded its own rules…How such resurrection can happen in the Supreme Court is a continuing source of wonder!”


Velasco and the Court

Sure, Velasco inhibited himself in the Reyes case. That is his best defense. But there are key factors at play.

First, the justice in charge of the case is Jose Perez, known to be a friend of Velasco’s. The 2 worked closely together for about 5 years when Velasco was chief court administrator and Perez was his deputy. They were also classmates at the UP College of Law.

Second, it can get to be a cozy network in the Court. The justices tend to look after each other. As Brion wrote in his dissenting opinion on the request of former Chief Justice Artemio Panganiban to expand his retirement benefits, “…such kind of ruling opens the Court itself to charges of selfishly ruling for its own interests...Why is this Court always liberal in cases involving themselves or former colleagues, but is very strict when considering the plight of lower-court judges?"

Third is Velasco’s personality. He is said to be generous with friends. He is easy to like, has a kind face, warm smile, and a disarming air of humility. When he talks to you, he bends his head slightly, as if to show respect, and his voice is soft and calm, even if he takes issue with you.

(That’s how I remember him when, in our one-on-one meeting many months ago, he informed me that he was withdrawing the 2 libel cases he had filed against me. He also told me he was terribly hurt by the phrase I used to describe him in my book, “practicing justice”—which I got from various lawyers—yet his tone was friendly, and at times, beseeching.)

Fourth and the most recent plus that Velasco gained is Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno’s apparent confidence in him. (She voted with the majority in the Reyes election case.) Facing a hostile majority on the Court, Sereno seems to have wooed him to her side. She designated him chair of the halls of justice committee, which is tasked to oversee the construction of some P3 billion worth of courts.

Velasco, as one of the most senior justices, also sits in the 3-member executive committee of the Court headed by the Chief Justice; the other is Associate Justice Antonio Carpio.

What this whole episode tells us is that the Court is very slow to change. More importantly, the institution needs a firm and determined leader to keep it above suspicion. - Rappler.com

Para sa buong storya basahin dito

House, SC on Collision Course Over Jurisdiction

By Maricel Cruz | Posted on Jul. 16, 2013 at 12:02am | 2,393 views

CONGRESS and the Supreme Court appeared headed for a collision Monday after Speaker Feliciano Belmonte Jr. told the justices to back off and let the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal (HRET) do its job to settle election-related cases against lawmakers.

“The Supreme Court and the Commission on Elections should allow the HRET to exercise

its exclusive mandate to hear election protests against members of this (16th) Congress,” Belmonte said.

Belmonte’s remarks came after the Court on Friday barred the HRET from acquiring jurisdiction over the disqualification case filed against elected Marinduque Rep. Regina Reyes, ruling that the Comelec retained authority over the case even though she was proclaimed the winner in the May 13 polls.

The Supreme Court said the HRET, the body tasked to resolve electoral cases against members of the House, had no jurisdiction over Reyes, who had not yet officially started her term.

But Mandaluyong City Rep. Neptali Gonzales II said the Court should recognize the powers of HRET to hear electoral protests against lawmakers, as guaranteed by the Constitution.

“The Supreme Court cannot encroach on the powers of the HRET. That is very clear in the Constitution, which created the HRET,” Gonzales said.

Gonzales maintained that the Court in several previous cases decided that once a House member is proclaimed, the HRET acquires jurisdiction over questions on his or her election.

The ruling of the Comelec to disqualify Reyes was based on a complaint filed by a private citizen claiming that Reyes was a US citizen.

The ruling was allegedly aimed at benefiting her opponent, former Marinduque Rep. Lord Allan Jay Velasco, a son of sitting SC Associate Justice Presbitero Velasco, Reyes said.

In affirming the Comelec ruling, the Court said Reyes does not become a member of the House until she completes three stages specified in the law—valid proclamation, proper oath taking and official assumption of office at noon of June 30 after the polls.

But Reyes said her camp was considering filing an impeachment complaint against the justices for the “culpable violation of the Constitution and a betrayal of public trust.”

“I beseech Presbitero Velasco to stop using his unelected post to further the interest of his family,” Reyes said in a news conference. Reyes was with her counsel, Harry Roque Jr.

She warned that his interference would give rise to “yet another constitutional crisis where Congress may be compelled to ignore a ruling of the Court reversing jurisprudence to benefit one of its own.”

Roque said they would file the impeachment complaint before the House committee on justice as soon as Congress opens next Monday.

Roque said they would use the dissenting opinion of Associate Justice Arturo Brion questioning the “undue haste” in dismissing the petition filed by Reyes seeking to stop the Comelec from disqualifying her.

Brion’s dissenting opinion was supported by Justices Antonio Carpio, Martin Villarama and Marvic Leonen.
Justice Jose Perez, who wrote the majority decision, was supported by Chief Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno and Justices Teresita Leonardo-De Castro, Lucas Bersamin, Mariano del Castillo, Roberto Abad and Bienvenido Reyes.

Velasco and Justices Jose Mendoza and Estela Perlas-Bernabe inhibited themselves from the case.

But Reyes denounced Velasco, alleging he influenced his fellow justices to favor his son.

“It was you (Justice Velasco) who sparked this constitutional crisis because instead of upholding the supremacy of the Constitution, the decision in Reyes versus Comelec undermined and made a mockery of the Constitution. This is clearly the impeachable offense,” Reyes said.

The magistrate branded Reyes’ statement as baseless and malicious.

Lawmakers said Monday the HRED acquires sole jurisdiction over any election protest that may be filed against a proclaimed winning candidate.

“Reyes remains a member of the House until the HRET decides otherwise,” one lawmaker said.

The younger Velasco, on the other hand, denounced Reyes and accused her of unethical and improper conduct in breach of the Code of Professional Responsibility and her oath of office by making “irresponsible, unethical and malicious statements” in connection with her disqualification case.

He added that Reyes violated the sub judice rule in which a party is not allowed to talk about the merits of the case while it is still under judicial consideration or determination.

Although the Court has already ruled on the case, its decision is not yet final, Velasco said. With Rey E. Requejo

Impeachment Complaint vs SC Justice Velasco, Nakaamba!

ISANG impeachment complaint ang nakaumang ngayon laban kay Supreme Court Justice Presbitero Velasco sa pagbubukas ng 16th congress.
 
Ito ay matapos kumpirmahin ngayon ni Marinduque Rep. Gina Reyes na ipaghaharap niya ng impeachment complaint si Velasco dahil sa paggamit ng impluwensya para makakuha ng paborableng desisyon sa Korte Suprema kaugnay sa election case ng kanyang anak.

Si Reyes ang tumalo kay dating Marinduque Rep. Lor Allan Velasco, ang anak ni Justice Velasco.

Sa isang press conference, sinabi ni Atty. Harry Roque, abogado ni Reyes na hihintayin lamang nila na magkaroon ng organisasyon sa Kamara at mabuo ang mga magiging miyembro ng House Committee on Justice.

Pangunahing ground for impeachment na binanggit nina Reyes at ng kaniyang abogado ay ang culpable violation of the constitution at betrayal of public trust.
Sa ngayon ay pinag-aaralan pa kung isasama sa reklamong impeachment ang lahat ng mga SC Justices na pumirma sa desisyon.

Ipinaliwanag ni Reyes na hindi siya umano nabigyan ng pagkakataon na magkomento sa petisyon bago inilabas ang desisyon na isang malinaw na paglabag sa due process.

Apila pa ng mambabatas kay Velasco na huwag gamitin ang kanyang posisyon sa Korte Suprema para sa interes ng kanyang mga kapamilya.

Unang diniskuwalipika ng SC si Reyes matapos manalo nitong nagdaang eleksyon dahil sa kaniyang pagiging US citizen batay na rin sa petisyong inihain ni Rep. Velasco.

Ipinakita ni Reyes na noon pang October 5, 2005 niya ay itinakwil ang kaniyang pagiging American citizen.
Kasabay nito ay hinamon ni Reyes si Justice Velasco na huwag magtago sa kaniyang “robe” at harapin siya sa isang debate kahit mismo sa kaniyang session hall at magsampa ng reklamo sa House of Representative Electoral Tribunal (HRET) na siyang sumasakop sa mga petisyon at protesta laban sa isang kongresista.

Para sa buong kwento buksan dito

HOUSE WON'T RECOGNIZE SC JUSTICE SON - GONZALES

MANILA, Philippines - The Marinduque election controversy is far from over even with the insistence of the Commission on Elections (Comelec) that the proclaimed winner, Regina Ongsiako Reyes, was a disqualified candidate.

The House of Representatives will not recognize Lord Allan Jay Velasco, who Reyes beat and who the Comelec wants to belatedly proclaim as the new winner.

Velasco is the son of Supreme Court (SC) Justice Presbitero Velasco Jr.

“As far as the House is concerned, the duly elected representative of the lone district of Marinduque is Regina Reyes,” Majority Leader Neptali Gonzales II said yesterday.

“She was the one who has been proclaimed by the provincial board of canvassers, and she has taken her oath before Speaker (Feliciano) Belmonte and has assumed office,” he said.

On Reyes’ part, she said she would raise her disqualification in the appeal she would file with the SC asking the tribunal to reconsider its ruling last June 25 that the Comelec still had jurisdiction over the issue.

Gonzales said the Comelec lost its jurisdiction over Reyes’ case the moment the provincial canvassing board proclaimed her winner, and any question after that about her election and qualification should be resolved by the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal (HRET).

“We have to be consistent with the Constitution, which says that the HRET shall be the ‘sole judge’ of all questions about the ‘election, returns and qualification’ of a House member. We also have to be consistent with our assertion that the HRET’s jurisdiction begins with the proclamation of a congressional winner,” he said.

In line with this stand of the House, Gonzales said the chamber is also recognizing Angelina Tan as the winning candidate in the fourth district of Quezon.

Reyes belongs to the ruling Liberal Party (LP), to which Belmonte and Gonzales also belong, while Tan is a Nationalist People’s Coalition member.

The Comelec has annulled the proclamation of both Reyes and Tan. In Tan’s case, the Comelec wanted her opponent, Wigberto Tañada Jr., who she beat by more than 4,000 votes, as the winning candidate. The Tañadas are LP members.

Gonzales said Velasco should now pursue the election protest he has filed against Reyes shortly after the latter was proclaimed winner.

“He should pursue that in the HRET, which is the proper forum and whose jurisdiction over his case he has already recognized,” he said.

Like Velasco, Tañada has filed an election protest against Tan with the HRET.

Velasco wielded influence?

In a press briefing the other day, Reyes hinted that Associate Justice Velasco allegedly wielded his influence in the tribunal’s recent decision annulling her proclamation.

But Velasco yesterday denied Reyes’ insinuation that he used his influence in the disqualification case against her. 

“The allegation that he wielded his influence in the case is baseless and malicious. Being a lawyer and an officer of the court, Atty. Reyes should have been circumspect in her statements,” Velasco’s office said in a statement.

Reyes said she is convinced that the SC allegedly sped up the resolution of her case since it failed to ask the comments of those involved in the case before issuing a ruling.

She also alleged that she was not given fair treatment by the Comelec and the SC because she was not given a chance to prove that she is indeed a Filipino citizen.

Reyes presented to the media proof that she is a natural-born Filipino, and that she was able to comply with the requirements under Republic Act 9225 in renouncing his foreign citizenship, which she acquired when she married an American citizen in the United States.

Reyes also lamented that the Comelec and SC supposedly gave credence to a published article of an unknown blogger who claimed that she is an American citizen, when the truth is, she was born in the Philippines, her parents are both Filipinos, and she also has an affidavit of renunciation of foreign citizenship.  – With Edu Punay, Paolo Romero

Para sa buong balita basahin dito

Kumento ni Fr. Joaquin Bernas Ukol Sa Kaso Ni REYES at VELASCO!

Reyes vs Velasco. No, that is not the title of the Supreme Court decision, but it could have been. The contenders for a congressional seat in Marinduque were Regina Reyes and Lord Allan Velasco.

I am not claiming that the decision of the Court against Reyes was wrong. All I want to say is that the decision missed an opportunity for the Court to teach lawyers clearer lessons on some contentious issues in election law. This might yet happen in the future. But for now let me take up four points which need elaboration.

First, how does a Filipino woman lose and later reacquire citizenship? Our Constitution says, “Citizens of the Philippines who marry aliens shall retain their citizenship, unless by their act or omission, they are deemed, under the law, to have renounced it.” But what acts or omissions may be deemed renunciation of citizenship?

Second, what is the final word on the meaning in political law of the domicile of a married woman? I recall the case of Marcos-Romualdez vs Comelec. The Court said: “Without as much belaboring the point, the term residence may mean one thing in civil law (or under the Civil Code) and quite another thing in political law. What stands clear is that insofar as the Civil Code is concerned—affecting the rights and obligations of husband and wife—the term residence should only be interpreted to mean ‘actual residence.’ The inescapable conclusion derived from this unambiguous civil law delineation, therefore, is that when the petitioner married the former president in 1954, she kept her domicile of origin and merely gained a new home, not a domicilium necessarium.” Justice Flerida Ruth Romero approached the subject as an aspect of the struggle of women for equality with men.

Third, there remain blurred issues arising from Republic Act No. 9225, the Dual Citizenship Law, in relation to election law. Section 5(2) says: “Those seeking elective public office in the Philippines shall meet the qualification for holding such public office as required by the Constitution and existing laws and, at the time of the filing of the certificate of candidacy, make a personal and sworn renunciation of any and all foreign citizenship before any public officer authorized to administer an oath.”

Does this requirement of renunciation of foreign citizenship apply to those filing a certificate of candidacy for a national office? If it does, it would seem to me to be an unconstitutional addition to the requirements for national office.

Finally, when is jurisdiction over contests passed on to the electoral tribunal? Jurisprudence has repeatedly said: “The Court has invariably held that once a winning candidate has been proclaimed, taken his oath, and assumed office as a Member of the House of Representatives, the COMELEC’s jurisdiction over election contests relating to his election, returns and qualifications ends, and the HRET’s own jurisdiction begins.” Or, stated in another manner, where the candidate has already been proclaimed winner in the congressional elections, the remedy of the petitioner is to file an electoral protest with the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal (HRET).

In all these past cases, the HRET had already been formed. Hence, the Court could say to the petitioner, “Go to the electoral tribunal as the ‘sole’ judge of all contests.” My question now is about media reports that the losing party in this case, as of last week, has already assumed office in Congress. Is this a rebuff of the Supreme Court decision of last June 25? What will happen next?

Para sa buong kwento basahin dito